310. Purple Prose: Byzantine Political Philosophy

Posted on

Byzantine political thought from the time of Justinian down to the Palaiologos dynasty wrestles with the nature and scope of imperial power.



Further Reading

• P.N. Bell (trans.), Three Political Voices from the Age of Justinian (Liverpool: 2009).


• D. Angelov, “Plato, Aristotle, and ‘Byzantine Political Philosophy,’” Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph 57 (2004), 499-523.

• D. Angelov, Imperial Ideology and Political Thought in Byzantium, 1204-1330 (Cambridge: 2007).

• E. Barker, Social and Political Thought in Byzantium from Justinian I to the Last Palaeologus (Oxford: 1957).

• J. García-Huidobro, “Michael of Ephesus and the Byzantine Reception of the Aristotelian Doctrine of Natural Justice,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94 (2012), 274-95.

• D.J. O’Meara, “Political Philosophy in Michael Psellos: the Chronographia Read in Relation to his Philosphical Work,” in B. Bydén and K. Ierodiakonou (eds), The Many Faces of Byzantine Philosophy (Athens: 2012), 153-70.

• T. Shawcross, “‘Do Thou Nothing without Counsel’: Political Assemblies and the Ideal of Good Government in the Thought of Theodore Palaeologus and Theodore Metochites,” Al-Masāq 20 (2008), 89-118.

• P. Wood, “We Have No King but Christ”: Christian Political Thought in Greater Syria on the Eve of the Arab conquest (c. 400-585) (Oxford: 2010).

The cheeseburger sketch from Saturday Night Live


Hermes on 22 October 2018

Byzantine Republicanism

It is kind of surprising that this otherwise informative segment does not draw on the latest work on the practice and thinking Byzantine politics, The Byzantine Republic by Anthony Kaldellis. Highly recommended. 

In reply to by Hermes

Peter Adamson on 22 October 2018

Byzantine Republic

Oh actually that is coming right up - I talk about this issue in an episode about Byzantine historians, in the context of discussing their attitude towards ancient Rome (will be episode 312). But maybe I should add it to the bibliography here too, thanks!

Hakon Bjornsen on 25 November 2022


I continually recommend this podcast to anyone who takes an interest in Byzantine history, your great storytelling style and solid sources on the subject are impressive.

Truth is that it is difficult for me to even compare Byzantium with a republic, they are opposite poles with nothing to share


In reply to by Hakon Bjornsen

Peter Adamson on 25 November 2022

Republicanism in Byzantium

I can see why you say that but the book referred to above, which I have only glancing familiarity with, is actually making a pretty subtle argument that one shouldn't just discard. The idea is not (of course) that the Byzantine government was republican in character. It is rather that the emperor was constantly under pressure from "democratic" forces which manifested in, e.g. riots and less overt forms of pressure, and which looked back to ideals of republicanism from earlier Roman history. So actually I think the thesis is quite plausible and worth taking seriously; of course Kaldellis is a leading Byzantine historian so that is hardly a surprise.

In reply to by Peter Adamson

Hakon Bjornsen on 27 November 2022


I understand your point, but as far as I know his entire concept is still quite debatable with major flaws that Treadgold himself came to point out among them:

"Yet his own explanation fits the historical evidence badly in other ways. First, he does not explain plausibly how a traditional ideology that the people could overthrow the emperor could have been transmitted from second-century Rome to fifth-century Constantinople, through gaps of thousands of miles and hundreds of years."

In reply to by Hakon Bjornsen

Peter Adamson on 27 November 2022

Byzantine republicanism

Yes, that is a good objection. The intellectual elite might well have been aware of the republican history of Rome but it's hard to see how the rioters in the street would have been.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.