Interview with Robinson Erhardt
In reply to Different sized infinities by Andrew Maclaren
Infinities
Thanks for checking out the interview! Just to start with your last point, there is definitely an open question (which people often forget) about whether everything mathematicians say about infinity can just be transferred to the kind of debate that was had in antiquity and the middle ages. For instance paradoxes might arise with infinitely large bodies that don't do so with infinitely large sets. Still, I think that the modern notion(s) of infinity would at the very least make the medievals less quick to take certain things as obviously absurd, like that point about the impossibility of doubling infinity: if this is impossible, then it is not obviously so, at least.
In reply to Infinities by Peter Adamson
Yes, I guess the medievals…
Yes, I guess the medievals didn’t have the opportunity to check in to Hilbert’s hotel.
Add new comment
- Add new comment
- 1146 views
Blog Archive
- September 2024 (4)
- July 2024 (2)
- March 2024 (1)
- February 2024 (2)
- December 2023 (2)
- November 2023 (2)
- October 2023 (3)
- September 2023 (3)
- August 2023 (1)
- July 2023 (1)
- June 2023 (2)
- May 2023 (3)
- April 2023 (3)
- March 2023 (6)
- February 2023 (2)
- January 2023 (5)
- November 2022 (3)
- October 2022 (1)
- September 2022 (1)
- August 2022 (1)
- July 2022 (6)
- May 2022 (3)
- April 2022 (2)
- March 2022 (3)
- January 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- November 2021 (3)
- October 2021 (1)
- September 2021 (3)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (2)
- June 2021 (3)
- May 2021 (2)
- April 2021 (4)
- March 2021 (4)
- February 2021 (1)
Different sized infinities
At around 1:24:40-55, you mentioned how that in an eternal universe juiper would have revolved around the earth an infinite amount of times, and that would mean the moon would have as well x 30, which would be absurd since that would mean that one infinity is bigger than another, with Robinson making a joke that they haven't read Cantor. Multiplying any positive number by infinity would actually just be infinity, not a bigger one. This wouldn't actually be related to Cantor.
Aside from clearing that up, this makes me wonder about two questions. 1. How would this mathematical fact effect their reasoning? Would it just simply solve the absurdity objection? 2. Cantor discovering that there are different sized infinities makes me wonder (if at all) how it would effect typical philosophical arguments and theories about infinity in classical/medieval philosophy in general? Or would we just avoid the issue by saying mathematical infinity is different than philosophical infinity?