38. Easy Does It: Non-Action in the Laozi

Posted on

The concept of wuwei or “non-action”: does it mean that the perfect sage or political ruler simply never does anything?

download-icon .

Themes:

Further Reading

 

• T. Bai, “How to Rule without Taking Unnatural Actions (而治): A Comparative Study of the Political Philosophy of the Laozi,” Philosophy East and West 59 (2009), 481-502.

• L. Cantor, “Laozi Through the Lens of the White Rose: Resonance or Dissonance?” Oxford German Studies 52 (2023), 62-79.

• N. Knightly, “The Paradox of Wuwei? Yes (and No),” Asian Philosophy 23 (2013), 115–36.

• X. Liu, “Naturalness (Tzu-jan), the Core Value in Taoism: its Ancient Meaning and its Significance Today,” in L. Kohn and M. Lafargue (eds), Lao-Tzu and the Tao-Te-Ching (Albany: 1998), 211-28.

• X. Liu, “Laozi’s Philosophy: Textual and Conceptual Analyses,” in X. Liu (ed.), Dao Companion to Daoist Philosophy (Dordrecht: 2015), 71-100

• H.-G. Moeller, The Philosophy of the Daodejing (New York: 2006).

• D. Sarafinas and R.R. Wang, “A Daoist Critique of Justice: Distance and Engagement in the Socio-Political World,” in J. Salomon and H.-W. Lee (eds), The Bloomsbury Handbook of Global Justice and East Asian Philosophy (London: 2024), 187-98.

• E. Slingerland, Effortless Action: Wu-Wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China (Oxford: 2003).

• M. Wenning, “Passive Resistance: a Daoist Approach,” in T. Byrne and M. Wenning (eds), The Right to Resist: Philosophies of Dissent (London: 2023), 113-30.

Comments

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.