What to expect when you're expecting Africana philosophy
Very soon, on April 1 to be exact (no fooling), we will be kicking off the series on Africana Philosophy, co-authored by Chike Jeffers! Here is a sneak preview. These are the planned episodes, not including interviews, for the first part of the series. Comments, of course, more than welcome!
Part One: Locating and Debating Precolonial African Philosophy
Introducing Africana Philosophy
Prehistoric Africa
Philosophy in Ancient Mesopotamia [as context for Egypt]
Philosophy in Ancient Egypt
Moral and Political Philosophy in Egyptian “Instructions”
Philosophy in Egyptian Narratives and Dialogues
Early Philosophy in Ethiopia
Zera Yacob and Walda Heywat
Islamic Philosophy in Sub-Saharan Africa
Philosophy in African Oral Traditions
African Philosophy of Time
God in African Philosophy
African Philosophy of the Person
Communalism in African Ethics and Politics
Gender in African Tradition
Knowledge and Destiny in African Philosophy
African Philosophy’s Emergence in Academia
The Reaction Against Ethnophilosophy
Sage Philosophy
Beyond the Reaction
Part Two will cover “Slavery and the Creation of Diasporic African Philosophy”
Part Three will cover “Africana Philosophical Thought in the 20th Century and Beyond”
In reply to Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes by Robert Vitt
I’m intrigued as to what
I’m intrigued as to what exactly is meant by ‘African Philosophy’. Subsahran Africa as a cohesive space with some sense of shared identity is, by en large, a product of the European colonialism. It’s impossible to say that there existed a single regime of ideas that thinkers and philosophers across the African content drew on nor a set of shared language or technical vocabulary in which philosophy was done. A thinker in Kongo probably had little to do with a scholar in West Africa. While even labels like Western philosophy or Islamic philosophy can at times serve to muddy the waters, we can at least say that literate elites in the ‘Islamic world’ would have been at least passingly familiar with a set of canonical figures, Avicenna for example, and would have generally relied on a shared philosophical vocabulary regardless of which literary language they chose to express themselves in. Instead of African philosophy, it might be more useful to speak in terms of African philosophies, separate heterogeneous traditions of intellectual thinking going on often with little contact with each other in various parts of the continent. I’m not an expert so I have no say here, but I’m wondering exactly what you mean by African philosophy and for that matter how you deal with the issue that a considerable amount of Islamic and ‘Greek’ philosophy was done in North Africa, the Maghreb and West Africa. And how will you deal with the religion-philosophy distinction? Though I personally find this separation pointless and less practical that it initially seems, it often leads to a lot of philosophical material being rejected out of hand as in fact religion and not within the scope of the historian of philosophy. This can have serious repercussions in the study of non-western philosophical cultures, as we’ve seen with the rejection of Sufism as silly mysticism and not real philosophy, and is especially problematic in an area as understudied as subsaharan Africa.
In reply to I’m intrigued as to what by That annoying guy
Right, that's a very good
Right, that's a very good point. I think Chike watches these comments and may add more but my answer would be: yes, to some extent we're going to be covering multiple philosophical traditions here. Ancient Egyptian philosophy is more connected to ancient Greek philosophy than to subsaharan Islamic philosophy for example. However, I don't really see that as a problematic issue, rather it is par for the course. I mean, you can draw some kind of line between Proclus and Hume, but it's might indirect and basically late antique Neoplatonism and early modern Empiricism are also two "philosophies." So, what we are going to be doing here is no less justifiable than studying European philosophy, which is what people usually do of course.
A caveat to that: once we get into the modern period and the diaspora, there is going to be a very unified story to tell because the effects of colonialism and the slave trade set a context for most of what we'll be covering (I believe) - which doesn't eliminate the diversity of Africa or people of African heritage of course. So your point is well taken but really, I suppose, only applicable to this first of the three sub-series.
In any other person's hands I
In any other person's hands I would be nervous, but Dr. Adamson's previous work speaks for itself. So excited for this series!
Add new comment
- Add new comment
- 5367 views
Blog Archive
- January 2018 (3)
- December 2017 (5)
- November 2017 (4)
- October 2017 (5)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (3)
- July 2017 (3)
- June 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (4)
- April 2017 (4)
- February 2017 (5)
- January 2017 (1)
- December 2016 (3)
- September 2016 (4)
- August 2016 (3)
- June 2016 (3)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (1)
- March 2016 (3)
- February 2016 (1)
- December 2015 (5)
- November 2015 (2)
- October 2015 (2)
- September 2015 (2)
- August 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (1)
- June 2015 (4)
- May 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (2)
- February 2015 (2)
- January 2015 (2)
- December 2014 (6)
- November 2014 (2)
- October 2014 (6)
- September 2014 (11)
Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes!!!!!!