39. The Wolf’s Footprint: Indian Naturalism

Posted on

The Cārvāka or Lokāyata tradition rejects the efficacy of ritual and belief in the afterlife, and restricts knowledge to the realm of sense-perception.

download-icon
.

Themes:

Further Reading

• R. Bhattacharya, “Cārvāka Fragments: A New Collection,” Journal of Indian Philosophy 30 (2002), 597-640. [Reprinted in his Studies, see below.]

 

• R. Bhattacharya, “What the Cārvākas Originally Meant: More on the Commentators on the Cārvākasūtra,” Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (2010), 529-42.

• R. Bhattacharya, Studies on the Cārvāka/Lokāyata (London: 2011).

• D. Chattopadhyaya, Lokāyata: a Study in Ancient Indian Materialism (New Delhi: 1973).

• P. Gokhale, “The Cārvāka Theory of Pramāṇas: A Restatement,” Philosophy East and West 43 (1993), 675-82.

• D. Riepe, The Naturalistic Tradition in Indian Thought (Seattle: 1961).

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Naturalism in Classical Indian Philosophy

Comments

Adam Johnson on 6 October 2024

Suppression of materialist philosophy in antiquity

Sorry for this belated comment. It seems to be a recurring theme in antiquity that the texts of the materialist philosphers have been lost or are fragmentary at best. If only we had the complete Barhaspatya sutras and Democritean texts. Yet Plato survives intact.

Would history have been very different if the works of the atomost/materialist philosphers had been preserved?  

In reply to by Adam Johnson

Peter Adamson on 7 October 2024

Materialism

Interesting point and question. I think the first thing to say here is that materialism was pretty unusual: you have the Hellenistic schools and Carvaka but really in both cases the mainstream was non-materialist. Also it is not random what was lost and what survived: as often emphasized on the podcast, Greek philosophy reaches us through late antiquity and the Byzantine tradition which is strongly marked by Neoplatonism. So it isn't, like, a coincidence that what materialist thought there was did not reach us. On the other hand the rise of materialism in the 17th century was triggered at least in part by recovery and renewed interest in Epicureanism and Hellenistic materialism. So you could actually argue that materialist ideas survived well enough to have all the influence that they would have been likely to exert anyway. 

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.