Childrens' book philosophy 11: Mick Inkpen on the use/mention distinction
[This is from a story about a doll left behind when a family moves house; the "little thing" is the doll]
Suddenly the glare of a torch beam stung the little thing's eyes.
"What have we got here?" said a voice.
"Oh, it's nothing," said another. "Let the new people get rid of it."
"So that's my name," thought the little thing, "Nothing!"
Then, in the quiet, he heard the patter of feet and a mouse came running towards him.
"New People always try to get rid of you," it said, without introducing itself. It looked at him. "Seen you under the rug. What are you?"
"Nothing," replied Nothing.
"Well, nothing or not, you can't stay here, not with New People coming," said the mouse.
- from Mick Inkpen, "Nothing," in The Mick Inkpen Treasury
(Compare Odysseus' cunning trick against the Cyclops, described here.)
I don't think this is an
I don't think this is an example of the use-mention. 'Nothing' is just being used in two different ways—as a name and as an abstract noun.
It reminds me of this passage from Alice Through the Looking Glass:
"I see nobody on the road," said Alice.
"I only wish I had such eyes," the King remarked in a fretful tone. "To be able to see Nobody! And at that distance, too! Why, it's as much as I can do to see real people, by this light!"
In reply to I don't think this is an by Phil
I like the Alice quote,
I like the Alice quote, thanks! I guess whether my example counts as use/mention depends whether you think treating a word as a name is "mentioning" the word. Upon reflection maybe you're right that it isn't.
Add new comment
Blog Archive
- May 2021 (2)
- April 2021 (4)
- March 2021 (4)
- February 2021 (1)
- January 2021 (2)
- December 2020 (3)
- November 2020 (3)
- October 2020 (4)
- September 2020 (2)
- August 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (4)
- June 2020 (2)
- May 2020 (1)
- March 2020 (4)
- February 2020 (1)
- January 2020 (5)
- November 2019 (2)
- October 2019 (4)
- September 2019 (3)
- August 2019 (3)
- July 2019 (2)
- June 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (2)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (2)
- February 2019 (4)
- January 2019 (2)
- December 2018 (5)
- November 2018 (1)
- October 2018 (3)
- September 2018 (5)
- August 2018 (8)
- July 2018 (4)
- June 2018 (2)
- May 2018 (3)
- April 2018 (5)
Actually on further
Actually on further reflection I don't think this exemplifies the use/mention distinction (which would be like the difference between saying "giraffes are animals" and "'giraffe' is a noun") but rather just a case of ambiguity - "nothing" used in its normal sense or asa proper name. Still, I think it's a nice little philosophical example.