Stanford Encyclopedia article: al-Razi
In reply to Doubts about al-Razi by Eduardo
Razi on prophecy
Yes, that's exactly my view: he was attacking imamism, the idea that one should follow specifically inspired interpreters of revelation, as found especially in proto-shiite groups like the Ismailis. And they, especially Abu Hatim al-Razi, misrepresented him as attacking prophecy in general. I think his view was just that revelation confirms the findings of reason and that the two are in perfect harmony; what he didn't like was the idea that the meaning of revelation would be inaccessible to reason and have a meaning available only to the select, inspired few. Thus his view was more like that of other falāsifa like Farabi, Ibn Rushd, etc. I argue for this at length in the book I just published on him.
Add new comment
- Add new comment
- 94 views
Blog Archive
- September 2024 (4)
- July 2024 (2)
- March 2024 (1)
- February 2024 (2)
- December 2023 (2)
- November 2023 (2)
- October 2023 (3)
- September 2023 (3)
- August 2023 (1)
- July 2023 (1)
- June 2023 (2)
- May 2023 (3)
- April 2023 (3)
- March 2023 (6)
- February 2023 (2)
- January 2023 (5)
- November 2022 (3)
- October 2022 (1)
- September 2022 (1)
- August 2022 (1)
- July 2022 (6)
- May 2022 (3)
- April 2022 (2)
- March 2022 (3)
- January 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- November 2021 (3)
- October 2021 (1)
- September 2021 (3)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (2)
- June 2021 (3)
- May 2021 (2)
- April 2021 (4)
- March 2021 (4)
- February 2021 (1)
Doubts about al-Razi
An amazing article professor Adamson! Just one question. Concerning al-Razi´s alleged denial of the necesity or even convenience of profets, what do you think in the end? Was he really a freethinker as meny have claimed, was he only misrepresented? Perhaps something in between?
From the article I get the impression that, though realizing we can´t have certainty on the matter, you lean towards the view that it was all just an exageration due to al-Razi´s ismailies enemies. Am I correct in interpreting you that way?
I understand it´s impossible to give an absolute statement about such a matter, but I would love to know what you think is the most plaussible answer.
Thanks!