Stanford Encyclopedia article: al-Razi
In reply to Doubts about al-Razi by Eduardo
Razi on prophecy
Yes, that's exactly my view: he was attacking imamism, the idea that one should follow specifically inspired interpreters of revelation, as found especially in proto-shiite groups like the Ismailis. And they, especially Abu Hatim al-Razi, misrepresented him as attacking prophecy in general. I think his view was just that revelation confirms the findings of reason and that the two are in perfect harmony; what he didn't like was the idea that the meaning of revelation would be inaccessible to reason and have a meaning available only to the select, inspired few. Thus his view was more like that of other falāsifa like Farabi, Ibn Rushd, etc. I argue for this at length in the book I just published on him.
Add new comment
- Add new comment
- 90 views
Blog Archive
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (3)
- July 2017 (3)
- June 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (4)
- April 2017 (4)
- February 2017 (5)
- January 2017 (1)
- December 2016 (3)
- September 2016 (4)
- August 2016 (3)
- June 2016 (3)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (1)
- March 2016 (3)
- February 2016 (1)
- December 2015 (5)
- November 2015 (2)
- October 2015 (2)
- September 2015 (2)
- August 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (1)
- June 2015 (4)
- May 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (2)
- February 2015 (2)
- January 2015 (2)
- December 2014 (6)
- November 2014 (2)
- October 2014 (6)
- September 2014 (11)
- August 2014 (3)
- July 2014 (1)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (3)
Doubts about al-Razi
An amazing article professor Adamson! Just one question. Concerning al-Razi´s alleged denial of the necesity or even convenience of profets, what do you think in the end? Was he really a freethinker as meny have claimed, was he only misrepresented? Perhaps something in between?
From the article I get the impression that, though realizing we can´t have certainty on the matter, you lean towards the view that it was all just an exageration due to al-Razi´s ismailies enemies. Am I correct in interpreting you that way?
I understand it´s impossible to give an absolute statement about such a matter, but I would love to know what you think is the most plaussible answer.
Thanks!